2014 Post 47- Evaluation Question 4- How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?

I answered Evaluation Question 4 on Linoit. The link can be found here, http://linoit.com/users/sabwilkin/canvases/Evaluation%204, to navigate click and drag the mouse to see the different post-it notes.

A screenshot of my work

2014 Post 46- Evaluation Question 3- What have you learned from your audience feedback?

I have answered this question on Slides, as I like how my work is presented on there. It can also be viewed via this link, here you can see the full version with the Soundcloud feedback and larger images.

2014 Post 45 Evaluation Question 2- How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?

I have answered this question via Kizoa, it can also be viewed via the link here.
It plays as a sideshow and there should be a pause button, as well as arrows for navigating.

Evaluation 2 - slideshow

2014 Post 44- Evaluation question 1- In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

I have answered this question using Prezi as I believe this presents all of my work more clearly, and is more engaging and interactive for the reader.

http://prezi.com/uabi4jqbcskq/evaluation-1/

2014 Post 43- Final Products

Below are our final products, our main task being our short film 'Catalyst' and the ancillary tasks, which are the posters and magazine double-page spread review.

Our magazine review

Our final film:

 Our roles for our final film included:

Director, editor and producer- Laura O'Brien

Camerawork- The majority was filmed by me, although some shots wherein I was acting were created by Laura O'Brien

 Acting- My entire group and I included

Scriptwriter- Myself

Storyboard artist- Laura O'Brien

Model- Charlie Holden

And our magazine included input from all of us.

2014 Post 42- Feedback for film magazine review

We have gathered feedback on our magazine double page spread review from teenagers aged 16-20 who are film fans, we believe these are the core of our short film's target audience.

Below I have summarised their responses:

Likes:

• layout was neat with image
• tone of voice fit that of a review; criticising
• mentions of director's techniques
• directly addressing audience
• it gives provides what is good and bad
• rating system and the comments were professional
• does not give away plot; entices you to watch film

Dislikes:

• font style too small
• slightly contradictory
• some points not clear
• tends to drag on in the middle

Improve:

• small mistakes of punctuation errors and film title in inverted commas